Universal Registration Document 2024

Glossary

Limits of our engagement

As the purpose of our engagement is to provide limited assurance, the nature (choice of techniques), extent (scope) and timing of the procedures are less than those required to obtain reasonable assurance.

Furthermore, this engagement does not provide guarantee regarding the viability or the quality of the management of Publicis Groupe SA, in particular it does not provide an assessment, of the relevance of the choices made by Publicis Groupe SA in terms of action plans, targets, policies, scenario analyses and transition plans, which would go beyond compliance with the ESRS reporting requirements.

It does, however, allow us to express conclusions regarding the entity’s process for determining the sustainability information to be reported, the sustainability information itself, and the information reported pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, as to the absence of identification or, on the contrary, the identification of errors, omissions or inconsistencies of such importance that they would be likely to influence the decisions that readers of the information subject to this engagement might make.

Our engagement does not cover any comparative information.

Compliance with the ESRS of the process implemented by Publicis Groupe SA to determine the information reported, and compliance with the requirement to consult the social and economic committee provided for in the sixth paragraph of Article L. 2312-17 of the Labor Code
Nature of procedures carried out

Our procedures consisted in verifying that:

  • the process defined and implemented by Publicis Groupe SA has enabled, in accordance with the ESRS, to identify and assess its impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters, and to identify the material impacts, risks and opportunities, that are disclosed in Chapter 4 Sustainability Statement of the Groupe management report, and
  • the information provided on this process also complies with the ESRS.

We also checked the compliance with the requirement to consult the social and economic committee.

Conclusion of the procedures carried out

On the basis of the procedures we have carried out, we have not identified any material errors, omissions or inconsistencies regarding the compliance of the process implemented by Publicis Groupe SA with the ESRS.

Concerning the consultation of the social and economic committee provided for in the sixth paragraph of Article L. 2312-17 of the French Labor Code we inform you that we inform you that this provision is not applicable, as Publicis Groupe SA is not required to set up a Social and Economic Committee.

Emphasis of matters

Without qualifying the conclusion expressed above, we draw your attention to the information provided in the Groupe management report in the following sections:

  • Point 4.1.2 CSR reporting methodology and process of the Groupe management report concerning:
    • the non-inclusion of the entire financial consolidation perimeter in the sustainability statement: companies accounted for using the equity method have not been included;
  • Point 4.1.9 Analysis of Double Materiality – impact and financial relating to the perimeter included in the consideration of the value chain as described;
  • Point 4.1.9 Analysis of Double Materiality – impact and financial of the Groupe management report concerning the presentation of impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) by Publicis Groupe SA.
Elements that received particular attention concerning the identification of impacts, risks and opportunities

The information on the identification of impacts, risks and opportunities is provided in Section 4.1.9 “Analysis of double materiality – impact and financial” of the Groupe’s management report.

We reviewed the process implemented by the entity to identify actual or potential impacts (negative or positive), risks and opportunities (“IROs”).

In particular, we assessed the steps taken by the entity to determine its impacts and dependencies, which may be a source of risks or opportunities, including the dialogue implemented, where applicable, with stakeholders.

We also used our professional judgment to assess the acceptability of the exclusions relating to companies accounted for by the equity method, as presented in Section 4.1.2 “CSR reporting methodology and process” of the Groupe management report.

We reviewed the entity’s mapping of identified IROs, including a description of their distribution within the entity’s own activities and value chain, as well as their time horizon (short, medium or long term), and assessed the consistency of this mapping with our knowledge of the entity and, where applicable, with the risk analyses carried out by the entities of the Group.

We:

  • assessed the way in which the entity has considered the list of sustainability topics enumerated by ESRS 1 (AR 16) in its analysis;
  • assessed the consistency of the actual and potential impacts, risks and opportunities identified by the entity with available sector analyses;
  • assessed the consistency of the actual and potential impacts, risks and opportunities identified by the entity, particularly those that are specific to it, as not covered or insufficiently covered by ESRS standards, with our knowledge of the entity;
  • assessed how the entity has taken into account the different time horizons, particularly with regard to climate issues;
  • assessed whether the entity has taken into account the risks and opportunities that may arise from both past and future events as a result of its own activities or business relationships, including actions taken to manage certain impacts or risks;
  • assessed whether the entity has taken account of its dependence on natural, human and/or social resources in identifying risks and opportunities.