Carbon Footprint
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG Protocol TeqCO₂)
Carbon Intensity:
- 2.65 TeqCO₂ per capita
- Down by 23.1% since 2019
- Scope 1: 5,211 TeqCO₂ Energy sources: gas, fuel oil, and other fluids + business travel by professional car
- Scope 2: 17,588 TeqCO₂ Purchased electricity + indirect emissions from heat network
- Scope 3: 264,278 TeqCO₂ Other business travel (including air and train) and personal travel + fixed assets* + consumables + waste + purchases of goods and services
/ Carbon offsetting: projects supported in Plans 1 & 2 since 2019
[ESRS 2 E1-4, AR 25 (a) & (b), E1-7-AR 56 (a) & 56 (b), 58, 59 (a)]
| Project name | Country | Project category | Type of project | International Standard | Cobenefit standard | SDG alignment | No. of credits in 2024 | Allocation of the offset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) |
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) Country India |
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) Project category Reduction |
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) Type of project Renewable energy (wind turbines in 3 regions) |
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) International Standard VCS |
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) Cobenefit standard – |
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) SDG alignment Nos. 7, 8, 13 |
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) No. of credits in 202472,288 |
Gandhi/Pawan (Plan 1 and Plan 2) Allocation of the offset 85% |
| Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2) | Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2)Country United States |
Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2)Project category Reduction |
Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2)Type of project Preservation of deciduous and coniferous forests |
Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2)International Standard ACR |
Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2)Cobenefit standard – |
Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2)SDG alignment Nos. 6, 13, 15 |
Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2)No. of credits in 202412,757 |
Forest of Maine and Forest of Michigan (Plan 2)Allocation of the offset 15% |
/ Quantitative information on GHG removals [E5-AR 60]
| Removals | Comparative data | N | % N/N-1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHG removal activity no. 1 (e.g. forest restoration) | GHG removal activity no. 1 (e.g.forest restoration )Comparative data
|
GHG removal activity no. 1 (e.g.forest restoration )N – |
GHG removal activity no. 1 (e.g.forest restoration )% N/N-1
|
| GHG removal activity no. 2(e.g. direct air capture) | GHG removal activity no. 2 (e.g.direct air capture )Comparative data
|
GHG removal activity no. 2 (e.g.direct air capture )N – |
GHG removal activity no. 2 (e.g.direct air capture )% N/N-1
|
Comparative data
|
N – |
% N/N-1
|
|
| Total GHG removals resulting from the Company’s own activities (in TeqCO2) | Total GHG removals resulting from the Company’s own activities (in TeqCO 2) Comparative data
|
Total GHG removals resulting from the Company’s own activities (in TeqCO 2) N
|
Total GHG removals resulting from the Company’s own activities (in TeqCO 2) % N/N-1
|
| GHG removal activity no. 1 (e.g. forest restoration) | GHG removal activity no. 1 (e.g.forest restoration )Comparative data
|
GHG removal activity no. 1 (e.g.forest restoration )N – |
GHG removal activity no. 1 (e.g.forest restoration )% N/N-1
|
| GHG removal activity no. 2 (e.g. direct air capture) | GHG removal activity no. 2 ( e.g. direct air capture) Comparative data
|
GHG removal activity no. 2 ( e.g. direct air capture) N – |
GHG removal activity no. 2 ( e.g. direct air capture) % N/N-1
|
| … | … Comparative data
|
… N – |
… % N/N-1
|
| Total GHG removals in the upstream and downstream value chain (in TeqCO2) | Total GHG removals in the upstream and downstream value chain (in TeqCO 2) Comparative data
|
Total GHG removals in the upstream and downstream value chain (in TeqCO 2) N
|
Total GHG removals in the upstream and downstream value chain (in TeqCO 2) % N/N-1
|
| Reversals (in TeqCO2) | Reversals (in TeqCO 2) Comparative data
|
Reversals (in TeqCO 2) N
|
Reversals (in TeqCO 2) % N/N-1
|